H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 0-1
Roberto Carballes Baena holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Carballes Baena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2019 Bastad fourth round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2021 | Belgrade | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 7-6(2) 2-6 0-0 (ret.) | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2019* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-1 7-6(4) | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |