H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Altmaier vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 2-1

Daniel Altmaier holds a 2–1 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Daniel Altmaier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2026 Rio Open first round 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Altmaier
Germany Age 27 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #129 6-4 7-6(7) Daniel Altmaier #54 Match data Feb 16, 2026 R32 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Daniel Altmaier #64 7-5 7-6(2) Dusan Lajovic #63 Match data Jun 22, 2022* R32 Mallorca Championships ATP 250 Grass
Daniel Altmaier #152 6-2 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #45 Match data Jul 24, 2021* QF Croatia Open Umag ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Altmaier #57 #44 1,148 1,774 80 132 37.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Altmaier Dusan Lajovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2017 2–3 40.0% #275 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2019 0–1 0.0% #279 1,530 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0
21 2020 3–3 50.0% #130 1,670 0 0 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0
22 2021 7–8 46.7% #84 1,725 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0
23 2022 5–21 19.2% #94 1,564 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0
24 2023 14–22 38.9% #56 1,648 0 0 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0
25 2024 12–22 35.3% #89 1,629 0 0 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0
26 2025 22–28 44.0% #46 1,758 0 0 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0
27 2026 15–24 38.5% #57 1,718 0 0 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Altmaier Dusan Lajovic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2017 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2022 2 11 13 15.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2024 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2025 15 18 33 45.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 32 63 95 33.7% 38 53 91 41.8% 10 16 26 38.5% — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 208/213 of Daniel Altmaier's and 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Altmaier Dusan Lajovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2017 5/5 8.0 3.0 60.9% 71.1% 44.6% 56.4% 32.9% 60.5% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 59.1% 46.2% 33.3% 0.0% 50.0% 40.9% 31.9% 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0%
21 2020 6/6 5.7 2.8 57.7% 69.1% 45.9% 68.5% 31.2% 58.7% 37.5% 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8%
22 2021 15/15 5.6 2.9 59.2% 71.6% 47.5% 68.3% 47.6% 61.6% 36.4% 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2%
23 2022 26/26 6.8 2.7 61.2% 69.6% 46.0% 59.0% 37.1% 60.5% 32.0% 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8%
24 2023 35/36 5.9 2.3 65.7% 68.6% 51.6% 61.3% 38.7% 62.8% 34.7% 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8%
25 2024 34/34 5.9 2.6 63.2% 69.9% 48.5% 56.5% 37.3% 61.8% 34.1% 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7%
26 2025 47/50 7.7 2.5 59.6% 71.8% 46.4% 55.1% 36.3% 61.6% 33.3% 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4%
27 2026 39/40 6.2 2.8 63.6% 70.3% 47.1% 51.4% 34.9% 61.7% 33.8% 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6%
Career — 208/213 6.5 2.6 62.1% 70.2% 47.7% 57.3% 37.4% 61.5% 33.8% — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Altmaier Dusan Lajovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2017 1541 104.5 -1.83 -2.08 0.731 44.9% — — +66 33.3% -1.17 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 1530 102.6 -2.67 -4.21 0.540 36.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
21 2020 1670 121.4 -2.65 +1.70 0.909 48.3% — +46 — 58.8% -0.18 0–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05
22 2021 1726 125.4 -2.00 -0.47 0.947 49.7% — +75 — 45.7% 0.00 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.06 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43
23 2022 1564 125.6 -1.76 -3.41 0.811 46.4% -64 +115 +4 26.9% -1.31 3–6 (33%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.18 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53
24 2023 1648 137.5 -1.07 -0.53 0.932 48.9% -114 +131 — 44.2% -0.29 3–10 (23%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.65 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93
25 2024 1630 131.3 -1.48 -1.33 0.893 48.3% -32 +35 — 40.7% -0.52 3–5 (38%) 12–9 (57%) — +0.54 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09
26 2025 1758 141.9 -1.65 -1.43 0.865 47.6% -36 -1 -218 43.1% -0.49 8–7 (53%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.62 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07
27 2026 1719 131.8 -2.25 -1.10 0.883 48.0% -64 +14 -139 38.3% -0.72 7–4 (64%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.78 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.10 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45
Career — 1775 137.1 -1.71 -1.32 0.878 47.9% -57 +57 -84 40.3% -0.59 29–37 (44%) 44–58 (43%) 99.2 -0.10 — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.