H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Daniel Brands vs Julian Reister H2H: 0-2
Julian Reister holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julian Reister leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Julian Reister won the 2011 Munich third round 7-6(1) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2012 | Doha | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | Julian Reister | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2011* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Julian Reister | 7-6(1) 6-1 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2010 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 7-5 6-4 | Julian Reister | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2010* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Julian Reister | 6-2 7-6(10) | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Reister | #1,197 | #83 | 612 | 1,748 | 14 | 34 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Brands | Julian Reister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #231 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #184 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #563 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |