H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Brands vs Rameez Junaid H2H: 1-0

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Rameez Junaid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2010 Libéma Open first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rameez Junaid
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #100 6-1 6-3 Rameez Junaid #334 Match data Jun 16, 2010* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rameez Junaid #1,437 #293 164 1,506 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Brands Rameez Junaid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #455 1,484 0 0
26 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #393 1,494 0 0
30 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Brands Rameez Junaid
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Brands Rameez Junaid
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4% 2006 1/1 2.0 5.0 56.9% 69.7% 36.0% 33.3% 40.0% 55.2% 34.9%
26 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4% 2010 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 45.0% 33.3% 0.0% 53.3% 23.3%
30 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4% — 2/2 2.0 4.0 56.2% 64.8% 40.5% 33.3% 20.0% 54.3% 29.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Brands Rameez Junaid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51 2005 1488 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24 2006 1484 106.3 +0.78 -1.93 0.779 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.14
26 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62 2007 1478 99.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11 2008 1462 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06 2009 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08 2010 1494 104.9 -6.17 -0.83 0.498 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.13
30 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04 2011 1481 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1469 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62 — 1506 103.1 -2.70 -1.38 0.636 41.6% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.