H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Elahi Galan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2023 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Colombia
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-2 6-4 | Daniel Elahi Galan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Elahi Galan | #304 | #56 | 863 | 1,777 | 45 | 73 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Elahi Galan | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #427 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #191 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |