H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Evans vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 4-0

Daniel Evans holds a 4–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2023 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Evans
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Evans #30 6-4 6-4 6-1 Jeremy Chardy Match data Jan 19, 2023* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Evans #26 7-6(6) 6-7(7) 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #51 Match data May 4, 2021* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Daniel Evans #28 6-4 1-6 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #54 Match data Mar 10, 2021* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard
Daniel Evans #33 6-2 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #66 Match data Feb 6, 2021* SF Murray River Open ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #72 2-6 6-4 6-4 Daniel Evans #48 Match data Oct 6, 2019* Q2 Q Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Evans #385 #21 2,195 1,926 141 161 46.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Evans Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2008 0–1 0.0% #477 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #261 1,442 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #363 1,504 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #342 1,489 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #297 1,533 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2013 4–2 66.7% #150 1,692 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2014 4–6 40.0% #305 1,679 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2016 9–8 52.9% #66 1,791 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2017 11–10 52.4% #133 1,820 0 0 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2018 0–1 0.0% #192 1,787 0 0 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2019 18–18 50.0% #42 1,815 0 0 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2020 16–13 55.2% #32 1,857 0 0 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2021 23–22 51.1% #25 1,836 0 1 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2022 27–26 50.9% #27 1,848 0 1 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2023 15–23 39.5% #38 1,761 0 2 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2024 7–20 25.9% #164 1,707 0 2 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
35 2025 7–6 53.8% #185 1,725 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Evans Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2017 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 2022 22 16 38 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2023 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2024 6 11 17 35.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 2025 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 102 97 199 51.3% 18 36 54 33.3% 21 28 49 42.9% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 297/302 of Daniel Evans's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Evans Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2008 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.2% 48.3% 35.0% 28.6% — 42.9% 15.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.3% 53.8% 30.3% 46.7% 100.0% 45.9% 29.7% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2010 1/1 5.0 3.0 52.2% 60.0% 56.3% 20.0% 36.4% 58.2% 44.9% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2011 2/2 7.5 10.0 63.8% 74.1% 53.8% 57.1% 52.4% 66.7% 33.8% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2012 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 58.3% 59.4% 69.2% 75.0% 58.8% 42.0% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2013 6/6 7.2 4.7 60.9% 67.8% 50.3% 65.8% 44.6% 61.3% 40.9% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2014 10/10 7.5 3.3 58.8% 71.6% 51.0% 55.6% 34.0% 63.1% 33.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2016 17/17 5.6 4.8 59.5% 70.2% 53.5% 63.1% 40.0% 63.5% 36.2% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2017 19/21 4.7 3.4 59.7% 71.7% 49.1% 53.3% 44.6% 62.0% 39.1% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2018 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.1% 73.5% 47.5% 66.7% 66.7% 61.8% 41.2% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2019 36/36 3.7 2.7 63.2% 71.1% 52.5% 60.1% 40.7% 64.2% 37.4% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2020 29/29 4.1 2.5 59.3% 71.4% 51.9% 60.2% 41.1% 63.6% 36.9% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2021 45/45 4.1 2.6 62.2% 70.4% 52.1% 64.4% 47.2% 63.5% 37.0% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2022 52/53 4.3 2.5 61.6% 71.6% 51.2% 54.9% 46.2% 64.1% 38.2% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2023 38/38 3.9 3.0 59.0% 72.1% 52.8% 61.9% 41.1% 64.1% 36.8% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2024 25/27 4.5 4.5 55.5% 70.8% 49.3% 61.2% 32.6% 61.0% 34.7% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
35 2025 13/13 3.6 3.1 56.8% 67.8% 47.6% 48.6% 43.1% 59.2% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 297/302 4.4 3.1 60.2% 70.8% 51.3% 59.1% 42.5% 63.1% 36.9% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Evans Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1482 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1465 96.1 -0.67 -0.93 0.265 31.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.06 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1442 94.1 +3.68 +2.34 0.549 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.15 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2010 1505 103.0 +1.24 -0.01 1.074 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.12 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2011 1490 102.4 +1.09 -0.34 1.014 49.8% — — — 28.6% 0.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2012 1533 112.2 +0.20 -2.14 1.018 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — 0.00 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2013 1692 123.6 -0.35 +1.64 1.058 51.1% -13 — -160 61.1% +0.33 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2014 1679 121.9 -0.68 -1.14 0.915 48.4% +41 — -157 42.9% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.49 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2015 1685 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2016 1792 134.4 +0.32 +0.67 0.994 50.2% -18 — -136 53.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.45 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 2017 1820 148.3 -1.83 +2.08 1.029 50.4% +56 -281 — 50.9% +0.03 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.93 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 2018 1787 101.8 -0.92 -0.58 1.078 51.7% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.12 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 2019 1816 150.4 -0.19 +1.96 1.045 50.6% +43 — -139 51.5% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.00 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 2020 1857 155.8 +0.55 +1.27 1.013 50.3% +40 -315 — 50.6% +0.19 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.13 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 2021 1836 156.0 +0.36 +0.91 1.016 50.3% +15 -200 -81 51.6% +0.10 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.12 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 2022 1848 156.2 +0.45 +2.12 1.064 51.0% +43 -209 -129 50.0% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.14 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 2023 1761 145.7 +0.74 +1.02 1.026 50.3% +32 -100 — 44.4% -0.27 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.30 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2024 1708 133.1 -3.07 -0.42 0.891 48.0% +63 -124 — 37.0% -0.90 3–9 (25%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.57 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
35 2025 1726 118.5 -1.93 -0.59 0.845 47.4% -17 — -2 46.9% -0.41 4–0 (100%) 0–2 — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1651 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1927 148.9 -0.19 +1.10 1.000 50.0% +35 -187 -101 48.2% -0.10 47–57 (45%) 60–70 (46%) 97.2 -1.63 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.