H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Evans vs Joao Sousa H2H: 0-1
Joao Sousa holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2019 Wimbledon third round 4-6 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Joao Sousa | 4-6 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Evans | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |