H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Alberto Martin H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Chile Open first round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-6 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alberto Martin
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 6-3 6-7(2) 6-6 (ret.) Alberto Martin #92 Match data Feb 5, 2009* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,801 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Alberto Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,490 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,712 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,608 0 2
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,675 0 3
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,654 0 3
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,623 0 3
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,660 0 3
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,623 0 3
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,591 0 3
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Alberto Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 15 21 28.6% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2002 9 10 19 47.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 53 100 153 34.6% 156 146 302 51.7% 8 16 24 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 449/485 of Alberto Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Alberto Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/5 0.8 3.5 59.4% 60.1% 55.1% 46.5% 46.6% 58.0% 37.8%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 1997 20/22 1.9 3.5 65.7% 60.6% 50.2% 60.8% 48.0% 56.7% 42.0%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 1998 8/8 1.0 3.8 62.4% 57.5% 33.5% 49.3% 47.5% 48.2% 33.0%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 1999 37/48 1.8 3.0 66.5% 64.6% 47.3% 57.7% 45.2% 58.8% 39.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 40/48 1.8 3.1 63.4% 63.5% 50.4% 50.5% 43.4% 58.5% 39.6%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2001 51/58 2.4 4.5 59.3% 68.8% 50.1% 54.3% 50.0% 61.0% 40.1%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2002 41/47 1.9 3.4 62.0% 63.3% 49.9% 51.6% 41.8% 58.0% 39.4%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2003 44/45 1.5 3.9 62.3% 66.4% 48.8% 54.8% 42.5% 59.6% 38.7%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2004 49/49 2.2 4.0 60.3% 67.0% 49.2% 54.1% 44.7% 59.7% 38.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2005 54/54 2.4 3.3 53.7% 67.2% 50.3% 58.2% 44.7% 59.2% 40.7%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2006 40/40 2.9 3.0 57.9% 66.0% 49.7% 54.4% 41.3% 58.7% 37.8%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2007 17/17 1.8 2.8 57.0% 63.6% 44.7% 50.8% 37.8% 55.8% 39.0%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2008 8/8 2.5 2.5 56.4% 66.0% 49.5% 40.2% 36.6% 58.9% 37.0%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2009 27/27 1.7 2.7 59.1% 64.4% 50.0% 53.6% 35.1% 58.5% 34.5%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2010 9/9 1.3 2.2 65.5% 62.4% 49.5% 48.5% 57.3% 58.4% 36.5%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 449/485 2.0 3.4 60.4% 65.3% 49.2% 54.1% 43.9% 58.7% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Alberto Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1502 99.4 -0.97 -1.12 0.900 47.9% — +22 — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.32
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 1997 1547 128.2 -2.35 +1.69 0.970 49.5% — +31 — 43.6% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.18
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 1998 1490 102.2 -4.79 -2.31 0.636 40.9% 0 +67 — 15.8% -2.68 1–0 0–1 — +0.15
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 1999 1712 133.5 -2.31 +1.21 0.966 49.4% -216 +60 -76 52.6% +0.09 7–4 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 106.0 +0.83
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1608 131.3 -2.69 +0.88 0.955 49.2% -119 +143 -2 41.2% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.40
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2001 1675 140.9 -0.51 +1.16 1.030 50.5% -64 +114 — 53.7% +0.11 11–13 (46%) 9–2 (82%) 105.2 +0.86
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2002 1700 141.3 -2.44 +1.41 0.938 48.5% -17 +63 — 46.8% -0.34 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 -2.23
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2003 1655 124.7 -1.98 +0.48 0.958 49.2% +14 +19 — 42.3% -0.50 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.6 +0.26
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2004 1623 133.1 -2.39 +1.11 0.951 48.9% -29 +128 — 44.9% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.7 -0.50
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2005 1660 145.8 -1.58 +2.44 0.998 50.0% -76 +132 -211 42.5% -0.53 9–4 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 105.4 -1.73
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2006 1624 129.7 -2.69 +0.56 0.917 48.2% -113 +148 — 45.7% -0.32 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 99.4 -0.43
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2007 1624 123.2 -3.59 +1.46 0.881 47.0% -130 +105 — 29.7% -1.49 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -1.47
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2008 1645 112.3 -2.97 +0.67 0.900 48.0% — +60 — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.37
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2009 1585 128.0 -3.17 -1.98 0.831 46.5% -33 +62 -107 30.5% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.6 -0.14
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2010 1592 115.8 -2.74 -1.64 0.876 47.6% — +61 — 61.1% +0.78 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +1.05
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1801 137.1 -2.23 +0.89 0.944 48.8% -68 +90 -94 44.5% -0.43 70–66 (51%) 72–71 (50%) 103.1 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.