H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Alberto Martin H2H: 1-0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Vina Del Mar third round 6-3 6-7(2) 6-6 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2009* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-6 (ret.) | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |