H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Andrey Golubev H2H: 2-0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 2–0 lead over Andrey Golubev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2011 Halle third round 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2011* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Andrey Golubev | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2010* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-3 6-4 | Andrey Golubev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrey Golubev | #1,694 | #33 | 1,210 | 1,781 | 51 | 107 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Andrey Golubev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #74 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #206 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |