H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2013 Winston-Salem Open first round 7-6(6) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
FRA Age 42 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Edouard Roger-Vasselin #68 Match data Aug 20, 2013* R64 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #806 #35 1,133 1,886 84 125 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Edouard Roger-Vasselin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #197 1,450 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2007 5–7 41.7% #97 1,578 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2008 2–6 25.0% #166 1,574 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #153 1,645 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2010 2–7 22.2% #124 1,611 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2011 6–12 33.3% #106 1,687 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2012 14–19 42.4% #102 1,665 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2013 23–26 46.9% #52 1,817 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2014 21–28 42.9% #87 1,693 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2015 6–12 33.3% #123 1,758 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2016 2–3 40.0% #293 1,678 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 14 18 32 43.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 48 72 120 40.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2004 3/3 3.0 2.0 73.4% 61.2% 44.5% 29.2% 61.1% 57.5% 30.3%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2007 12/12 2.8 2.2 67.3% 64.9% 44.0% 48.6% 33.4% 58.0% 35.9%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2008 8/8 2.8 2.6 63.7% 64.9% 44.1% 55.0% 53.5% 57.4% 31.6%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2009 5/5 7.4 1.4 64.2% 68.3% 47.0% 70.6% 46.7% 60.7% 33.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2010 9/9 4.7 3.4 59.4% 67.6% 47.1% 45.8% 30.0% 59.1% 35.0%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2011 18/18 4.0 2.4 63.0% 68.3% 52.3% 51.5% 35.3% 62.1% 37.5%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2012 33/33 5.0 2.7 64.3% 71.7% 50.2% 57.1% 38.8% 64.0% 35.8%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2013 49/49 3.9 2.5 63.7% 70.9% 50.4% 58.9% 40.5% 63.4% 36.8%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2014 49/49 4.3 2.3 66.4% 70.5% 51.2% 68.7% 37.5% 64.0% 34.5%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2015 18/18 5.0 2.2 64.5% 70.1% 47.3% 44.3% 35.0% 61.9% 35.1%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2016 5/5 4.0 2.2 68.3% 61.0% 47.0% 45.0% 46.8% 56.6% 36.1%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 209/209 4.3 2.4 64.7% 69.5% 49.5% 57.2% 38.8% 62.4% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2003 1503 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2004 1450 90.3 -2.33 -2.96 0.712 43.6% — — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–0 — +0.48
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1469 106.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2007 1578 108.2 -1.34 -0.29 0.854 47.0% -145 +16 +81 42.4% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.09
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2008 1575 118.4 -1.74 -2.54 0.743 45.6% -109 -18 — 22.2% -1.39 0–2 0–1 — -0.20
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2009 1646 121.4 +0.50 -0.06 0.849 48.5% -88 — — 42.9% -0.36 1–1 0–1 — -0.27
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2010 1612 119.9 -2.05 -0.35 0.854 47.2% -4 — — 29.2% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 -0.25
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2011 1688 137.6 -0.32 -0.04 0.991 49.7% -24 -33 +47 41.7% -0.40 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 92.4 +0.15
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2012 1666 139.7 +0.76 -1.06 0.993 50.0% +27 -35 +91 45.9% +0.07 5–9 (36%) 6–10 (38%) 92.6 -0.14
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2013 1817 146.6 -0.17 +0.53 1.005 50.0% -16 -55 -141 45.0% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 4–15 (21%) 96.3 -0.06
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2014 1694 149.9 -0.06 -0.92 0.959 49.5% +33 0 +37 47.2% -0.02 7–11 (39%) 13–18 (42%) 95.1 -1.58
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2015 1758 131.8 -1.35 -0.48 0.921 48.2% +25 — — 38.8% -0.88 4–7 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 102.0 -0.93
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2016 1679 115.8 -0.56 -0.28 0.832 46.3% — — — 46.7% -1.13 0–2 2–0 — -0.31
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1887 138.3 -0.34 -0.48 0.943 49.0% 0 -26 +24 42.9% -0.34 31–49 (39%) 38–53 (42%) 89.6 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.