H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Evgeny Korolev H2H: 1-2

Evgeny Korolev holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Evgeny Korolev leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 6-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Evgeny Korolev
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #113 6-4 (ret.) Evgeny Korolev #95 Match data May 27, 2009* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Evgeny Korolev #83 6-3 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #81 Match data Apr 10, 2009* R16 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
Evgeny Korolev #113 6-7(8) 7-6(2) 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #131 Match data Apr 18, 2008* R16 Valencia International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Evgeny Korolev #1,762 #46 1,012 1,793 72 92 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Evgeny Korolev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 2006 8–8 50.0% #103 1,614 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2007 20–24 45.5% #80 1,680 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2008 13–17 43.3% #106 1,679 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 17–17 50.0% #53 1,729 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2010 12–20 37.5% #140 1,666 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2012 1–3 25.0% #211 1,624 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #329 1,608 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Evgeny Korolev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 15 29 48.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 10 10 20 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 47 47 94 50.0% 22 32 54 40.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Evgeny Korolev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 2006 16/16 5.1 4.6 58.5% 73.4% 48.5% 66.9% 41.2% 62.9% 37.2%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2007 44/44 5.0 3.3 57.4% 67.7% 45.9% 53.6% 42.4% 58.7% 35.1%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2008 30/30 4.4 4.2 58.7% 69.1% 45.1% 61.9% 33.7% 59.6% 36.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 34/34 5.8 2.5 60.4% 73.3% 49.8% 47.8% 48.0% 63.7% 36.5%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2010 32/32 4.6 3.9 55.5% 68.6% 46.2% 53.1% 44.2% 58.9% 37.8%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2012 4/4 4.3 3.5 57.7% 68.0% 44.5% 42.1% 24.2% 58.0% 38.0%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2013 4/4 2.0 4.0 54.7% 65.6% 43.7% 27.1% 11.5% 54.5% 22.0%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 164/164 4.9 3.6 58.0% 69.8% 46.8% 54.2% 41.0% 60.2% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Evgeny Korolev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2006 1614 127.8 +0.28 +0.04 1.003 50.4% -58 +39 — 51.1% +0.02 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.32
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2007 1681 129.7 -3.44 -1.27 0.850 47.3% +4 -32 -173 43.3% -0.66 10–5 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -2.17
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2008 1679 123.9 -2.52 +0.94 0.901 48.4% -19 -14 — 43.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.64
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1730 138.6 +0.09 +0.28 1.007 50.2% +46 -47 -263 51.2% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–5 (71%) — +1.26
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2010 1666 132.3 -3.23 +1.40 0.920 48.5% +87 -105 -198 45.3% -0.31 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.58
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2011 1548 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2012 1624 120.7 -1.32 -0.40 0.906 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.19
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2013 1609 109.9 -3.36 -2.25 0.485 39.9% — +47 — 33.3% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.32
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2014 1566 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2015 1561 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1794 131.2 -2.08 +0.10 0.908 48.5% +24 -23 -210 45.9% -0.39 26–26 (50%) 35–31 (53%) 103.7 -2.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.