H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Florent Serra H2H: 1-1
Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Florent Serra are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florent Serra leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2012 St. Petersburg third round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2012* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Florent Serra | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2008* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Florent Serra | 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Florent Serra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |