H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Gilles Muller

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Gilles Muller.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
No head-to-head meetings found.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,075 203 201 50.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,574 0 0 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,610 0 0 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,685 0 0 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,693 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,631 0 0 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,745 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,612 0 0 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,894 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,967 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,942 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,688 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Gilles Muller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 29 48 39.6% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 396/404 of Gilles Muller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Gilles Muller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2013 9/9 11.8 3.1 59.7% 73.9% 46.5% 60.7% 33.2% 63.0% 26.5%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 396/404 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.9% 67.3% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Gilles Muller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 +0.30 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 +0.06
20 2006 1505 106.2 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 -0.11 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — +0.01
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) +0.50
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) +0.23 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -10 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) -2.04
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) -1.40 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) +1.50
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) -2.22 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 +0.07
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) -0.67 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 0.00
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) +0.15 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) +0.37
27 2013 1575 139.0 -1.56 -0.76 0.924 48.5% -57 +150 -119 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) +0.51 2010 1611 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.36
28 2014 1626 138.5 -1.25 +0.15 0.933 48.7% -93 +103 -205 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) -0.40 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -130 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) -0.21
29 2015 1611 125.3 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -205 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) +0.07 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) -1.49
30 2016 1685 120.4 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +95 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) +1.14 2013 1693 117.5 +0.19 -5.50 0.716 45.7% +67 -160 — 25.0% -1.30 1–1 3–3 (50%) -0.15
31 2017 1631 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — -0.08 2014 1746 140.5 +1.86 -1.98 0.832 47.2% +9 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -0.81
32 2018 1612 104.9 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.05 2015 1895 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -11 -296 -39 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) -1.40
33 2019 1517 93.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -19 — -21 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) -1.52
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1943 155.8 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -86 -275 +132 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1689 130.9 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +15 -57 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) +1.14
Career — 1810 134.8 -1.25 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +97 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) -1.01 — 2076 149.9 +3.17 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +2 -175 -5 48.4% -0.13 65–57 (53%) 152–124 (55%) -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.