H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-1
Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Horacio Zeballos are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2014 Vina Del Mar fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2014* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-2 6-4 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2013* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-2 6-3 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
| Jan 29, 2008* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 0-6 6-3 6-1 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |