H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Kristian Pless

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Kristian Pless.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Kristian Pless
DEN Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #215 6-4 4-6 8-6 Kristian Pless #200 Match data May 24, 2005* Q3 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kristian Pless #939 #65 592 1,712 44 82 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kristian Pless
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #458 1,511 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #197 1,507 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2001 12–10 54.5% #68 1,662 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 15–22 40.5% #82 1,664 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2003 2–5 28.6% #440 1,611 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2004 3–9 25.0% #230 1,553 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #160 1,543 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #84 1,626 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2007 5–16 23.8% #128 1,509 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #158 1,480 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kristian Pless
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 10 18 44.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 29 47 76 38.2% 7 16 23 30.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 115/126 of Kristian Pless's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kristian Pless
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 1999 2/3 3.5 2.5 55.5% 69.0% 58.7% 50.0% 39.6% 64.4% 38.5%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2000 2/5 2.5 1.5 60.9% 70.2% 51.6% 56.4% 35.0% 62.6% 25.7%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2001 21/22 5.0 3.1 60.1% 70.8% 50.9% 62.4% 46.5% 62.6% 35.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 31/37 5.5 3.3 63.2% 67.8% 50.8% 59.2% 53.3% 61.6% 36.6%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2003 7/7 8.4 4.9 57.4% 72.8% 51.9% 46.2% 37.8% 63.9% 34.6%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2004 12/12 7.9 5.4 60.1% 66.8% 46.4% 58.8% 36.7% 58.8% 32.8%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2005 2/2 8.5 5.0 54.5% 74.9% 49.2% 51.4% 33.3% 62.9% 31.8%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2006 15/15 5.9 3.1 62.1% 69.4% 48.7% 47.6% 37.5% 61.5% 33.6%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2007 21/21 6.2 2.4 61.7% 70.9% 55.6% 55.8% 36.6% 65.0% 32.2%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2008 2/2 5.0 18.0 51.6% 72.8% 30.8% 61.1% 39.0% 52.5% 39.6%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 115/126 6.0 3.6 61.0% 69.6% 50.8% 56.5% 43.1% 62.2% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Kristian Pless
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 1999 1512 115.3 +0.37 -0.73 1.081 51.1% +36 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.24
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2000 1507 114.5 -1.58 +0.79 0.687 43.9% +16 — — 27.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2001 1662 127.6 +0.83 -1.40 0.942 48.9% -41 -69 -106 56.0% +0.36 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.5 +0.18
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1665 129.1 -0.41 -1.13 0.952 49.1% +34 -142 -129 43.8% -0.31 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 93.2 +0.31
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2003 1611 110.7 +1.63 -3.19 0.959 49.3% +14 — — 36.8% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.32
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2004 1554 115.9 -1.68 -2.74 0.796 46.5% +38 — — 31.4% -1.09 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.4 -0.03
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2005 1543 109.1 +1.45 -2.88 0.857 46.1% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.01
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2006 1627 114.5 -0.75 -2.22 0.871 47.5% -38 — -39 31.6% -1.05 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.3 +0.18
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2007 1509 129.5 +1.72 -2.07 0.922 48.7% +21 +22 -12 31.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 4–10 (29%) 94.1 -0.35
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2008 1481 100.6 -2.49 -0.88 0.834 46.4% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.34
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2009 1482 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1713 126.6 +0.14 -1.77 0.910 48.4% +9 -81 -67 38.9% -0.54 12–25 (32%) 19–34 (36%) 88.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.