H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-4

Lukasz Kubot holds a 4–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Lukasz Kubot leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2014 Doha third round 6-4 6-3.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
POL Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 2014 Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Clay Lukasz Kubot #83 2-6 6-1 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #102 Match data
Jan 1, 2014* Doha ATP 250 R32 Hard Lukasz Kubot #72 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #77 Match data
Oct 24, 2013* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Lukasz Kubot #70 7-6(6) 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 4-6 6-4 Lukasz Kubot #76 Match data
Sep 21, 2012* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Daniel Gimeno-Traver #93 6-4 7-6(5) Lukasz Kubot #76 Match data
Jul 14, 2011* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Lukasz Kubot #69 7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 R32 Clay Lukasz Kubot #197 7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 118 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,486 0 0
2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,661 0 0
2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2012 21–26 44.7% #74 1,721 0 0
2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2013 10–16 38.5% #72 1,674 0 0
2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,673 0 0
2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,700 0 0
2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0