H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Casablanca round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Malek Jaziri
TUN Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #95 6-4 6-3 Malek Jaziri #89 Match data Apr 9, 2015* R32 Casablanca ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Malek Jaziri #1,645 #42 1,042 1,843 84 136 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Malek Jaziri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #118 1,536 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2012 6–11 35.3% #116 1,603 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #168 1,606 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2014 8–11 42.1% #76 1,687 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2015 12–20 37.5% #103 1,681 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2016 15–22 40.5% #58 1,724 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 13–22 37.1% #98 1,697 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2018 20–22 47.6% #45 1,716 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 6–17 26.1% #201 1,555 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #249 1,530 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–3 40.0% #312 1,522 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #433 1,508 0 0
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1645 1,504 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Malek Jaziri
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 9 15 24 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 13 15 28 46.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 14 24 41.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 56 87 143 39.2% 20 30 50 40.0% 8 19 27 29.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 217/220 of Malek Jaziri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Malek Jaziri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2011 2/2 6.5 5.5 54.8% 71.2% 50.1% 70.1% 17.6% 61.8% 36.2%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2012 15/17 4.8 2.7 58.9% 65.8% 47.9% 55.5% 31.5% 58.5% 34.1%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2013 1/1 2.0 2.0 48.1% 61.5% 47.6% 54.5% 50.0% 54.3% 24.2%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2014 19/19 3.9 3.1 49.1% 72.1% 48.7% 58.2% 32.9% 60.3% 32.5%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2015 32/32 4.4 3.0 52.9% 71.2% 49.6% 61.7% 38.5% 61.1% 34.1%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2016 36/37 4.1 3.3 53.0% 72.1% 49.4% 59.0% 33.9% 61.5% 34.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 35/35 4.9 3.5 52.8% 71.1% 47.7% 52.2% 39.8% 60.0% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 42/42 3.7 3.0 54.2% 70.8% 48.4% 55.2% 43.8% 60.3% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 23/23 2.9 3.5 56.1% 67.7% 46.6% 59.9% 43.4% 58.5% 33.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 2.5 2.5 49.0% 41.0% 47.8% 47.2% 0.0% 44.4% 28.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 1.8 1.6 54.3% 60.1% 48.2% 42.0% 77.8% 54.6% 33.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.8 1.5 54.1% 66.8% 47.3% 51.8% 41.7% 57.9% 27.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 2.0 2.0 43.2% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 37.8% 23.1%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 217/220 4.0 3.1 53.5% 69.8% 48.3% 56.5% 38.8% 59.8% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Malek Jaziri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2010 1457 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2011 1536 118.9 -1.79 +0.89 0.949 48.5% — — — 42.9% -0.14 — — — -0.05
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2012 1604 124.4 -3.73 -1.37 0.823 46.4% +6 -112 +19 43.2% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.22
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2013 1606 114.7 +2.69 +4.26 0.531 40.8% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.19
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2014 1688 125.6 -2.36 -2.49 0.818 47.0% +14 — -54 41.9% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.8 +1.41
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2015 1681 131.4 -3.13 -1.13 0.876 47.9% +17 -201 -48 39.8% -0.58 6–6 (50%) 3–8 (27%) 97.8 +0.89
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2016 1725 143.8 -1.50 -1.46 0.889 48.2% -13 -156 -117 43.9% -0.45 6–9 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.9 -0.41
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1697 145.4 -3.57 -0.39 0.864 47.4% +47 -170 — 40.0% -0.74 5–7 (42%) 6–8 (43%) 96.8 -1.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1716 138.3 -2.92 -0.31 0.893 48.3% -6 -3 -175 45.4% -0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) 108.0 +0.48
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 125.4 -4.00 -2.81 0.797 46.4% +71 +87 — 32.1% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 99.0 +0.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1530 110.8 0.00 -0.76 0.509 36.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.23
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1522 106.5 -3.25 -2.60 0.747 44.6% +80 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1509 105.1 -2.52 -2.80 0.659 44.2% — — — 14.3% -2.72 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1504 99.5 +0.80 -2.44 0.371 30.3% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.01
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1843 139.1 -2.86 -1.24 0.845 47.2% +18 -42 -70 40.4% -0.74 35–38 (48%) 37–49 (43%) 101.4 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.