H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 0-1

Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2009 Chile Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Paul Capdeville
CHI Age 43 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paul Capdeville #126 6-3 7-6(3) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #99 Match data Feb 13, 2012 Q2 Q Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Paul Capdeville #102 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 Match data Feb 6, 2009* R16 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paul Capdeville #1,186 #76 960 1,730 36 67 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Paul Capdeville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #455 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #305 1,456 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #148 1,535 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2006 6–11 35.3% #149 1,530 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2007 12–12 50.0% #102 1,700 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2008 6–13 31.6% #111 1,631 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2009 8–14 36.4% #129 1,568 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #165 1,482 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2011 0–7 0.0% #131 1,528 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2012 1–5 16.7% #166 1,525 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #154 1,592 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Paul Capdeville
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 21 35 56 37.5% 13 25 38 34.2% 2 7 9 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 100/103 of Paul Capdeville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Paul Capdeville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2003 1/1 4.0 11.0 51.9% 55.0% 35.1% 30.0% 50.0% 45.5% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 1.0 68.8% 56.8% 45.0% 55.6% 100.0% 53.1% 32.2%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2005 2/2 8.0 2.5 56.5% 66.8% 49.9% 52.3% 34.9% 59.4% 37.6%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2006 17/17 4.0 2.8 57.6% 68.6% 46.2% 49.6% 60.0% 59.2% 34.6%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2007 22/24 4.7 3.2 60.9% 66.5% 46.2% 54.8% 38.2% 58.7% 36.8%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2008 19/19 3.6 2.4 61.7% 64.6% 47.0% 49.4% 39.9% 58.1% 37.9%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2009 22/22 3.7 2.8 62.4% 67.7% 49.5% 43.7% 36.4% 60.8% 35.7%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2010 2/2 2.5 4.5 64.5% 70.7% 43.9% 58.3% 44.4% 61.7% 42.8%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2011 6/7 4.0 4.0 61.4% 60.6% 40.9% 54.8% 67.5% 53.4% 36.9%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2012 6/6 4.0 4.2 60.2% 66.1% 48.1% 53.3% 43.9% 58.8% 34.9%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2013 2/2 7.5 2.0 66.2% 74.8% 54.7% 68.8% 75.0% 68.0% 39.3%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 100/103 4.1 3.1 60.9% 66.4% 47.0% 50.4% 45.5% 58.9% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Paul Capdeville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2003 1484 96.4 -3.13 -3.45 0.570 38.4% — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.20
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1456 96.0 -3.44 -1.82 0.687 43.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.22
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2005 1536 113.6 +0.23 +0.69 0.926 49.3% — — — 42.9% 0.00 — — — -0.12
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2006 1531 116.6 -3.29 -0.67 0.848 47.6% +35 -36 — 41.9% -0.61 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.26
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2007 1700 124.3 -3.60 +0.19 0.892 48.1% +27 -144 — 44.3% -0.18 5–1 (83%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.51
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2008 1631 119.8 -3.41 +0.96 0.904 47.9% +14 -7 — 42.0% -0.72 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.55
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2009 1568 123.0 -2.11 -1.83 0.911 47.7% +56 +29 -95 42.9% -0.45 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.80
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2010 1482 105.1 -0.04 +0.28 1.119 52.2% — — — 50.0% +0.83 1–1 — — +0.15
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 2011 1529 112.0 -3.82 -1.53 0.792 45.7% -11 +105 — 17.6% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.02
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 2012 1525 114.2 -3.63 -1.30 0.848 47.1% -24 +106 — 33.3% -0.93 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.19
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 2013 1592 118.4 -0.58 +2.10 1.229 53.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.18
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2014 1583 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1731 121.9 -2.98 -0.45 0.885 47.7% +24 +3 -95 40.3% -0.61 12–25 (32%) 16–17 (48%) 94.8 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.