H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 0-1

Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2009 Libéma Open first round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Raemon Sluiter
NED Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raemon Sluiter #866 6-2 7-5 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #100 Match data Jun 17, 2009* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Raemon Sluiter #1,007 #46 742 1,750 84 121 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Raemon Sluiter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #716 1,492 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #241 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #162 1,474 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2000 8–7 53.3% #95 1,622 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2001 7–12 36.8% #131 1,617 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2002 10–14 41.7% #71 1,660 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2003 19–24 44.2% #59 1,629 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2004 19–22 46.3% #82 1,624 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2005 5–14 26.3% #106 1,539 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2006 8–15 34.8% #119 1,573 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2007 3–4 42.9% #169 1,597 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #1040 1,587 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2009 4–1 80.0% #197 1,649 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Raemon Sluiter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 11 11 22 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 32 50 82 39.0% 24 37 61 39.3% 23 26 49 46.9% 5 8 13 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 198/205 of Raemon Sluiter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Raemon Sluiter
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 1996 1/1 0.0 9.0 53.0% 65.7% 41.9% 60.0% 28.6% 54.5% 34.2%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 1998 4/5 3.3 4.8 58.6% 67.8% 54.4% 52.0% 26.5% 62.0% 37.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 7.0 4.0 59.1% 67.5% 51.3% 59.3% 23.8% 61.3% 38.0%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2000 12/15 7.3 4.3 57.2% 72.1% 54.9% 51.4% 47.3% 64.7% 34.7%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2001 18/19 5.0 4.6 56.1% 75.7% 48.8% 61.9% 47.7% 64.0% 36.5%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2002 22/24 6.5 4.0 57.4% 72.2% 50.1% 54.2% 41.7% 62.7% 37.9%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2003 43/43 7.0 3.3 60.5% 70.9% 51.1% 57.6% 43.9% 63.3% 34.5%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2004 41/41 8.4 2.8 60.1% 75.5% 51.1% 59.6% 40.2% 65.8% 34.7%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2005 19/19 8.5 4.2 54.7% 70.9% 48.5% 59.8% 43.2% 60.7% 33.6%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2006 23/23 7.3 3.0 56.2% 74.3% 51.3% 50.5% 36.2% 64.3% 35.2%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2007 7/7 8.3 1.9 53.1% 75.8% 52.7% 36.9% 44.8% 65.1% 32.7%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2008 1/1 7.0 0.0 61.0% 69.4% 47.8% 50.0% — 61.0% 22.0%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2009 5/5 5.4 1.8 68.0% 74.7% 50.0% 79.4% 54.7% 66.6% 35.1%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 198/205 7.2 3.5 58.3% 73.1% 50.8% 56.7% 41.9% 63.8% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Raemon Sluiter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 1996 1493 100.9 -3.84 +1.44 0.753 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.04
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 1998 1484 104.7 -1.50 -0.08 0.991 49.0% +55 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.01
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1474 103.8 -1.44 +0.65 0.983 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 1–1 — -0.26
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2000 1623 126.4 +1.43 +0.04 0.983 49.8% +12 -54 — 51.2% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 8–4 (67%) 104.8 -0.32
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2001 1617 114.4 +0.95 -0.30 1.013 50.5% -45 -129 -21 40.0% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 -0.17
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2002 1660 124.1 +0.70 +0.29 1.016 50.2% -36 -208 -2 41.9% -0.55 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 98.7 -0.54
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2003 1630 128.0 +0.83 -2.22 0.939 49.0% -20 -122 +79 45.0% -0.28 8–8 (50%) 10–17 (37%) 99.9 +0.50
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2004 1624 131.1 +2.64 -1.67 1.016 50.1% -2 -40 +58 46.5% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–10 (55%) 100.7 -0.44
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2005 1539 117.6 -1.66 -2.22 0.854 47.5% +24 +30 +95 34.0% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 -0.49
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2006 1574 125.0 +1.47 -1.38 0.984 49.3% -6 +5 +50 39.3% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 95.6 -0.12
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2007 1597 109.8 -0.61 -3.22 0.938 49.1% — -13 — 41.2% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.51
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2008 1587 101.9 -3.09 +0.82 0.565 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2009 1650 104.0 +0.06 -1.40 1.052 51.3% — — +102 60.0% +0.90 2–0 0–1 — +0.57
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2010 1623 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1750 128.4 +0.89 -1.33 0.969 49.4% -8 -60 +41 42.7% -0.44 29–41 (41%) 44–59 (43%) 96.5 -0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.