H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 2-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 2–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2014 Argentina Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #84 7-5 6-2 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #165 Match data Feb 13, 2014* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 7-5 6-2 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #103 Match data May 1, 2011 Q2 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #157 2-6 6-1 6-2 Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #123 Match data Feb 21, 2008* R32 Argentina Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo #1,153 #50 826 1,704 68 133 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #154 1,491 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2002 0–3 0.0% #141 1,496 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2003 5–11 31.2% #80 1,477 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2004 7–19 26.9% #130 1,448 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2005 5–5 50.0% #120 1,499 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2006 25–20 55.6% #57 1,665 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #133 1,546 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2008 1–6 14.3% #121 1,569 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2009 4–10 28.6% #156 1,584 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2010 1–4 20.0% #77 1,571 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2011 5–15 25.0% #130 1,532 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2012 3–12 20.0% #91 1,571 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #166 1,567 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2014 0–3 0.0% #224 1,620 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 7 29 36 19.4% 61 94 155 39.4% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 192/196 of Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2003 16/16 4.5 3.1 60.8% 67.7% 46.4% 48.6% 50.7% 59.1% 39.0%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2004 25/26 2.2 3.6 57.9% 66.1% 46.0% 58.2% 34.5% 57.6% 33.6%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2005 10/10 1.8 1.6 61.2% 66.2% 52.9% 44.7% 42.7% 61.5% 38.1%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2006 44/45 4.2 2.4 59.1% 70.0% 46.7% 56.8% 45.3% 60.5% 38.8%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2007 25/27 2.9 4.9 55.2% 65.2% 43.6% 52.4% 60.3% 55.5% 38.3%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2008 7/7 1.7 4.6 53.1% 66.9% 43.3% 51.5% 40.4% 55.7% 39.0%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2009 14/14 2.4 5.1 55.3% 67.0% 45.5% 62.4% 38.6% 57.2% 36.2%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2010 5/5 3.4 3.2 58.2% 68.7% 41.4% 48.3% 29.2% 57.3% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 20/20 2.5 4.4 55.9% 63.8% 44.8% 53.5% 47.8% 55.3% 35.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 15/15 2.7 5.2 53.7% 66.8% 46.2% 49.3% 37.1% 57.2% 35.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 4.3 4.1 53.9% 71.8% 47.5% 61.8% 36.2% 60.3% 34.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 0.7 3.7 50.9% 60.3% 45.5% 47.8% 47.2% 53.6% 34.5%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 192/201 3.1 3.7 57.1% 67.1% 45.9% 54.2% 44.4% 58.0% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2000 1482 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2001 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.09
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2002 1497 110.2 — — — — — +38 — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — -0.52
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2003 1478 114.0 -1.75 -0.48 0.954 48.8% -2 +54 — 40.5% -0.76 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.83
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2004 1448 112.1 -4.06 -3.50 0.792 46.1% -24 +58 — 33.8% -1.28 2–5 (29%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.77
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2005 1500 117.9 -0.46 -0.04 0.991 49.6% — +55 — 50.0% +0.05 — 1–0 — -0.16
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 2006 1665 136.3 -0.89 +0.15 0.983 50.1% -205 +93 — 51.8% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.23
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 2007 1546 122.6 -4.46 +0.12 0.860 47.2% -108 +96 — 38.8% -0.85 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.16
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 2008 1570 121.0 -2.71 +1.08 0.881 47.6% — +67 — 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.05
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2009 1585 117.3 -3.43 -1.01 0.847 47.1% -183 +83 — 33.3% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.21
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2010 1571 118.8 -1.59 -2.39 0.781 46.7% — +106 — 18.2% -1.27 — 0–2 — -0.10
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1532 118.2 -5.08 -1.56 0.798 46.2% -132 +68 — 31.4% -1.35 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.81
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1571 127.4 -3.34 -2.07 0.818 46.7% -103 +25 -145 27.5% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1568 119.9 -1.67 -1.61 0.864 47.7% — +36 — 38.9% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.50
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1620 118.9 -2.17 -1.23 0.744 44.3% — +60 — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — 0.00
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1603 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1605 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1528 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1705 127.1 -2.77 -0.95 0.877 47.8% -121 +72 -145 38.5% -0.80 19–41 (32%) 29–35 (45%) 92.4 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.