H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-4

Santiago Giraldo holds a 4–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Santiago Giraldo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Santiago Giraldo
COL Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Santiago Giraldo #35 6-1 7-5 6-0 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #96 Match data Jun 25, 2014* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Santiago Giraldo #71 6-3 4-6 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #97 Match data Mar 8, 2014* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Santiago Giraldo #80 6-3 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 Match data Oct 28, 2013 Q1 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Santiago Giraldo #87 6-4 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #72 Match data Sep 30, 2013 Q1 Q China Open ATP 500 Hard
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 7-6(4) 7-5 Santiago Giraldo #49 Match data Apr 12, 2011* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Santiago Giraldo #44 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 Match data Mar 12, 2011* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Santiago Giraldo #64 6-2 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #58 Match data Jan 12, 2011* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Santiago Giraldo #1,242 #28 1,230 1,929 142 186 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Santiago Giraldo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2007 0–4 0.0% #141 1,471 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2008 2–7 22.2% #163 1,602 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 0–3 0.0% #107 1,550 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #64 1,715 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2011 29–26 52.7% #55 1,793 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2012 18–20 47.4% #57 1,792 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2013 14–24 36.8% #69 1,751 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2014 28–27 50.9% #32 1,787 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2015 21–26 44.7% #70 1,695 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2016 8–13 38.1% #91 1,694 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2017 3–10 23.1% #227 1,668 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2018 1–1 50.0% #253 1,645 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2019 1–2 33.3% #274 1,656 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Santiago Giraldo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 8 8 16 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 7 14 21 33.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 8 14 22 36.4% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 5 9 44.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 56 92 148 37.8% 72 76 148 48.6% 14 17 31 45.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 324/328 of Santiago Giraldo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Santiago Giraldo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2007 4/4 4.3 3.0 58.8% 65.7% 46.5% 63.4% 39.7% 57.7% 34.7%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2008 9/9 4.1 1.4 56.9% 63.1% 55.0% 49.7% 38.1% 59.6% 34.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 4.7 1.0 58.0% 62.9% 54.4% 70.5% 48.3% 59.2% 29.8%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2010 40/40 4.8 1.7 61.2% 69.7% 51.8% 57.9% 37.0% 62.7% 36.5%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2011 55/55 3.7 1.3 63.3% 68.3% 51.4% 58.6% 49.2% 61.9% 37.4%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2012 36/38 2.8 1.0 64.7% 67.1% 52.8% 64.1% 39.8% 62.3% 35.8%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2013 38/38 4.2 1.8 63.6% 69.1% 51.9% 54.0% 39.7% 62.8% 35.4%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2014 55/55 3.7 1.4 63.9% 70.2% 51.5% 60.7% 46.5% 63.1% 37.6%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2015 45/47 2.7 1.4 69.2% 66.5% 48.6% 57.5% 36.6% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2016 21/21 4.9 1.9 56.6% 69.6% 49.9% 49.4% 43.3% 60.9% 36.8%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2017 13/13 4.3 2.9 61.1% 67.8% 40.8% 52.4% 38.3% 57.1% 33.1%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2018 2/2 2.5 0.0 64.4% 66.0% 51.4% 50.0% 20.0% 60.8% 33.6%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2019 3/3 2.3 1.3 71.2% 67.5% 54.6% 61.1% 37.0% 64.0% 36.3%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 324/328 3.7 1.5 63.4% 68.3% 50.9% 57.8% 41.8% 61.8% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Santiago Giraldo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2006 1489 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2007 1472 108.1 -1.44 -0.51 0.820 46.6% +35 — — 18.2% -1.18 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.20
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2008 1602 121.8 -2.27 -0.88 0.857 47.1% +14 -45 — 28.6% -1.14 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.32
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1550 114.7 -2.83 -1.90 0.730 45.5% — — — 22.2% -1.78 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2010 1716 137.5 -0.76 +0.26 0.979 49.4% -38 -35 -156 43.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.7 +0.06
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2011 1794 154.0 -0.50 +0.21 0.983 50.0% -22 -10 -203 50.7% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 98.6 -1.33
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2012 1792 145.3 +0.06 +0.03 0.950 49.5% -18 +45 -225 50.0% +0.04 3–8 (27%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.75
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2013 1752 136.2 -1.11 -1.26 0.950 49.0% -13 -3 -180 38.9% -0.50 5–8 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 94.1 +1.40
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2014 1787 149.4 -0.14 +1.00 1.018 50.6% -95 +113 -154 50.0% +0.06 7–8 (47%) 12–9 (57%) 100.9 +0.16
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2015 1695 140.7 -2.68 -0.26 0.922 48.7% -48 +140 -52 45.8% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 98.6 +1.63
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2016 1694 132.8 -2.00 +0.54 0.940 48.9% -1 +40 — 42.6% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 6–3 (67%) 100.4 -0.14
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2017 1668 117.0 -3.98 -2.23 0.771 45.3% -24 +59 — 30.3% -1.18 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 +0.11
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2018 1646 110.0 +1.63 +0.23 0.858 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.15
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2019 1656 107.0 -2.00 0.00 1.010 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.26
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1929 142.1 -1.10 -0.04 0.951 49.2% -33 +56 -154 44.7% -0.25 41–59 (41%) 50–63 (44%) 91.8 +0.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.