H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-4

Santiago Giraldo holds a 4–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Santiago Giraldo leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-5 6-0.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
COL Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Santiago Giraldo #35 6-1 7-5 6-0 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #96 Match data
Mar 8, 2014* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Santiago Giraldo #71 6-3 4-6 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #97 Match data
Oct 28, 2013 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Santiago Giraldo #80 6-3 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 Match data
Sep 30, 2013 Beijing ATP 500 Q1 Q Hard Santiago Giraldo #87 6-4 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #72 Match data
Apr 12, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 7-6(4) 7-5 Santiago Giraldo #49 Match data
Mar 12, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Santiago Giraldo #44 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #61 Match data
Jan 12, 2011* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Santiago Giraldo #64 6-2 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Santiago Giraldo #1,242 #28 1,230 1,929 141 185 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Santiago Giraldo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2007 0–4 0.0% #141 1,471 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2008 2–7 22.2% #163 1,602 0 0
21 2009 0–3 0.0% #107 1,551 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #64 1,718 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0 2011 29–26 52.7% #55 1,793 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0 2012 17–19 47.2% #57 1,796 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2013 14–24 36.8% #69 1,753 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2014 28–27 50.9% #32 1,786 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2015 21–26 44.7% #70 1,717 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0 2016 8–13 38.1% #91 1,700 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0 2017 3–10 23.1% #227 1,670 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0 2018 1–1 50.0% #253 1,645 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0 2019 1–2 33.3% #274 1,657 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0