H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Santiago Ventura H2H: 2-0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 2–0 lead over Santiago Ventura in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2010 Costa Do Sauipe third round 7-6(7) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2010* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 7-6(7) 6-1 | Santiago Ventura | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2008* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-2 6-1 | Santiago Ventura | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2007 | Casablanca | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Santiago Ventura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Santiago Ventura | #1,034 | #65 | 814 | 1,701 | 38 | 59 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Santiago Ventura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–2 | 80.0% | #104 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,506 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #227 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |