H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2008 Valencia round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #131 6-4 6-4 Sergiy Stakhovsky #126 Match data Apr 17, 2008* R32 Valencia International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.1 +1.40
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) 105.2 -0.67
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 +0.79
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) 95.4 -1.40
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 95.4 -0.19
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) 102.0 -0.26
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 102.1 -0.06
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.6 -0.26
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.6 -0.83
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.