H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Simon Greul H2H: 0-1

Simon Greul holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simon Greul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simon Greul won the 2009 Chennai round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Simon Greul
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Simon Greul #125 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #88 Match data Jan 8, 2009* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Simon Greul #563 #55 855 1,752 43 73 37.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Simon Greul
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #252 1,501 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #130 1,439 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2006 11–16 40.7% #82 1,536 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2007 2–10 16.7% #216 1,479 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #126 1,523 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2009 15–15 50.0% #59 1,697 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2010 12–25 32.4% #130 1,632 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2011 3–3 50.0% #154 1,607 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Simon Greul
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 6 7 13 46.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 7 15 22 31.8% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — — — 19 33 52 36.5% 20 32 52 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 115/116 of Simon Greul's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Simon Greul
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2003 1/1 1.0 5.0 50.6% 57.1% 56.1% 50.0% 25.0% 56.6% 32.3%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2005 2/2 15.0 4.5 56.2% 70.5% 47.6% 58.3% 27.1% 60.3% 31.5%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2006 27/27 3.7 2.9 54.9% 67.6% 48.2% 56.0% 34.4% 59.0% 35.4%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2007 12/12 3.8 2.2 55.7% 63.3% 49.3% 49.7% 35.9% 56.9% 34.2%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2008 1/1 4.0 0.0 52.6% 56.1% 45.9% 50.0% 50.0% 51.3% 25.7%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2009 30/30 4.4 3.2 56.1% 70.1% 51.0% 54.2% 40.3% 61.6% 35.4%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2010 36/37 2.7 3.7 58.4% 66.2% 47.4% 56.1% 47.6% 58.4% 34.1%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2011 6/6 4.8 4.5 58.1% 70.8% 56.1% 61.4% 42.6% 64.5% 37.1%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 115/116 3.8 3.3 56.5% 67.4% 49.2% 55.1% 40.6% 59.5% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Simon Greul
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20 2003 1501 101.9 -1.99 -0.91 0.744 43.8% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.13
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24 2004 1489 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95 2005 1439 95.7 -0.95 -3.32 0.794 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–1 — +0.05
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72 2006 1536 124.7 -2.24 -0.59 0.865 47.6% +22 -26 — 42.4% -0.59 4–4 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.60
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11 2007 1480 107.3 -3.43 -2.92 0.794 45.3% +27 — — 21.4% -1.75 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.71
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22 2008 1523 105.5 -1.05 +0.24 0.528 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.05
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44 2009 1698 130.7 -1.08 -1.71 0.922 48.8% -145 +6 — 45.9% -0.30 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.19
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04 2010 1633 124.1 -3.82 -1.99 0.820 46.7% -73 -3 -17 35.4% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.61
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22 2011 1607 113.5 -0.49 +1.49 1.047 51.0% -36 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.39
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2012 1536 103.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2013 1481 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1753 122.8 -2.43 -1.50 0.859 47.4% -45 -6 -17 38.8% -0.82 12–16 (43%) 18–27 (40%) 98.1 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.