H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Simon Greul H2H: 0-1
Simon Greul holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simon Greul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simon Greul won the 2009 Chennai third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2009* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Simon Greul | 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Simon Greul | #563 | #55 | 855 | 1,753 | 43 | 73 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Simon Greul | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #82 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #216 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |