H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Tiago Lopes.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 | Tiago Lopes | Match data | Feb 9, 2015 | Q2 | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tiago Lopes | #1,454 | #316 | 146 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Tiago Lopes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Tiago Lopes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2004 | 1482 | 101.5 | +0.02 | -4.18 | 0.507 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1504 | 103.3 | -2.38 | -5.10 | 0.811 | 45.3% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 1505 | 106.3 | -1.22 | -1.03 | 0.768 | 45.4% | — | +18 | — | 28.6% | -1.21 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.11 | 2007 | 1485 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 1519 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 1631 | 128.1 | +1.40 | -0.10 | 1.161 | 52.0% | — | +43 | — | 51.5% | +0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.3 | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 1642 | 132.0 | -1.77 | -1.98 | 0.851 | 47.2% | -138 | +74 | -75 | 27.9% | -1.10 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.0 | -1.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 1733 | 140.5 | +0.99 | -2.01 | 0.927 | 48.4% | -136 | +88 | — | 43.3% | -0.43 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–11 (39%) | 101.8 | -1.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 1644 | 128.2 | -2.58 | -1.56 | 0.865 | 47.0% | -119 | +119 | -118 | 28.4% | -1.45 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–7 (36%) | 95.4 | -0.72 | 2012 | 1471 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 1621 | 127.1 | -1.49 | -2.10 | 0.892 | 48.0% | -62 | +56 | — | 34.1% | -0.95 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.0 | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 1576 | 139.2 | -1.50 | -0.77 | 0.924 | 48.5% | -58 | +152 | -118 | 41.1% | -0.62 | 5–12 (29%) | 7–11 (39%) | 95.0 | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 1628 | 138.6 | -1.23 | +0.16 | 0.933 | 48.7% | -95 | +102 | -208 | 39.5% | -0.54 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–8 (27%) | 92.9 | -0.44 | 2015 | 1480 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 1612 | 125.5 | -1.66 | -0.02 | 0.954 | 49.0% | -140 | +126 | -207 | 40.5% | -0.59 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–9 (40%) | 101.8 | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 1686 | 121.3 | -3.34 | -1.10 | 0.850 | 47.5% | — | +96 | — | 40.5% | -1.00 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.6 | +1.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 1632 | 93.9 | -2.78 | -4.11 | 0.400 | 35.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 1613 | 105.0 | -4.25 | -1.02 | 0.691 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1518 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1810 | 134.9 | -1.24 | -1.13 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -103 | +98 | -139 | 37.7% | -0.77 | 35–51 (41%) | 41–66 (38%) | 95.2 | -1.00 | — | 1500 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 14, 2014 | H2H |
| Albert Montanes | 2 | 4 | 6 | Apr 8, 2016 | H2H |
| Carlos Berlocq | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 3, 2014 | H2H |
| Lukasz Kubot | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 1, 2014 | H2H |
| Fabio Fognini | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 19, 2016 | H2H |
No career rivalry data available.