H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Vasek Pospisil

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Vasek Pospisil.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Vasek Pospisil
CAN Age 36 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #66 7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(2) Vasek Pospisil #113 Match data Oct 21, 2012 Q1 Q Valencia ATP 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vasek Pospisil #1,265 #25 1,359 1,957 122 163 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Vasek Pospisil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 2011 3–4 42.9% #119 1,668 0 0
22 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0 2012 4–13 23.5% #125 1,619 0 0
23 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0 2013 17–15 53.1% #32 1,800 0 0
24 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0 2014 20–24 45.5% #53 1,807 0 0
25 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0 2015 24–22 52.2% #39 1,869 0 0
26 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0 2016 9–22 29.0% #133 1,746 0 0
27 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0 2017 6–13 31.6% #108 1,693 0 0
28 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0 2018 8–14 36.4% #70 1,756 0 0
29 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0 2019 3–5 37.5% #149 1,809 0 0
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0 2020 16–10 61.5% #61 1,925 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0 2021 8–14 36.4% #133 1,762 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0 2022 4–3 57.1% #98 1,717 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #437 1,649 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #733 1,627 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% #1265 1,611 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Vasek Pospisil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 17 17 34 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2016 8 14 22 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
28 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 2020 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — 103 120 223 46.2% 0 14 14 0.0% 19 29 48 39.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's and 281/285 of Vasek Pospisil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Vasek Pospisil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/7 8.6 4.4 54.5% 73.1% 51.4% 52.5% 39.2% 63.1% 33.1%
22 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4% 2012 16/17 8.3 3.8 56.2% 71.4% 45.1% 56.2% 30.5% 59.9% 32.7%
23 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4% 2013 32/32 11.2 4.0 54.4% 80.6% 53.7% 61.1% 38.8% 68.5% 37.0%
24 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4% 2014 42/44 9.3 3.8 59.4% 75.1% 51.2% 61.4% 38.0% 65.4% 33.2%
25 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7% 2015 46/46 10.7 3.2 58.2% 77.7% 53.6% 66.1% 39.6% 67.8% 32.0%
26 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2% 2016 30/31 8.5 3.4 58.7% 73.8% 50.0% 45.5% 44.8% 63.8% 31.2%
27 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1% 2017 19/19 8.3 2.7 56.8% 73.2% 49.1% 52.9% 46.5% 63.0% 33.1%
28 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1% 2018 22/22 8.6 4.2 58.8% 74.0% 50.4% 66.4% 38.2% 64.4% 31.5%
29 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5% 2019 8/8 9.6 3.4 59.5% 79.6% 49.3% 55.6% 44.5% 67.4% 32.6%
30 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0% 2020 26/26 10.2 3.2 61.4% 78.0% 50.9% 72.5% 37.0% 67.5% 35.3%
31 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0% 2021 22/22 9.7 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 46.7% 67.6% 42.4% 63.3% 31.3%
32 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1% 2022 7/7 10.6 2.3 59.6% 83.0% 49.8% 53.0% 30.2% 69.4% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 10.5 8.0 51.0% 71.1% 48.0% 66.1% 47.1% 59.3% 35.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 0.0 54.5% 83.3% 20.0% 0.0% — 54.5% 33.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 1/1 6.0 5.0 44.0% 89.0% 30.0% 44.0% 75.0% 56.0% 32.0%
Career — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4% — 281/285 9.6 3.5 58.0% 76.2% 50.5% 60.6% 39.6% 65.4% 33.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Gimeno-Traver Vasek Pospisil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14 2008 1483 94.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30 2009 1473 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11 2010 1449 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1669 135.2 +0.34 +0.71 0.897 48.7% +21 — — 42.1% +0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — -0.34
22 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20 2012 1619 116.6 -1.54 -2.79 0.814 46.9% +14 — -31 25.0% -1.43 2–2 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 -0.02
23 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24 2013 1800 148.9 +3.32 +0.96 1.175 52.2% -21 — -159 53.5% +0.38 7–12 (37%) 11–13 (46%) 98.8 +1.76
24 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95 2014 1807 146.4 +1.54 -1.76 0.960 49.4% +9 -326 -174 48.1% -0.06 7–9 (44%) 7–11 (39%) 94.9 +1.15
25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72 2015 1869 156.2 +3.23 -2.76 0.995 50.3% +6 — -82 49.6% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 8–16 (33%) 99.1 -0.84
26 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11 2016 1747 141.0 +0.35 -3.11 0.863 47.7% +33 -313 -51 32.0% -1.07 3–5 (38%) 9–11 (45%) 96.6 -1.55
27 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22 2017 1693 134.0 -0.45 -1.33 0.895 48.1% -4 — +64 37.2% -0.74 2–6 (25%) 6–5 (55%) 97.2 -1.00
28 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44 2018 1756 139.4 +0.81 -2.42 0.885 48.8% +23 — -49 41.1% -0.54 1–4 (20%) 7–7 (50%) 97.6 -0.26
29 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04 2019 1809 142.8 +2.29 -1.10 0.999 50.2% +18 — — 44.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 -0.58
30 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22 2020 1926 160.3 +3.38 +0.49 1.086 51.7% +27 — — 54.7% +0.34 4–2 (67%) 5–7 (42%) 100.4 -2.70
31 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07 2021 1762 131.1 +0.54 -3.48 0.852 48.1% +48 — -121 37.7% -0.55 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 94.3 -1.01
32 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 2022 1717 128.5 +1.53 +0.90 1.112 51.8% +55 — — 50.0% +0.69 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
33 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1650 115.7 -0.70 +0.42 0.858 47.2% — — — 16.7% -0.67 — 0–2 — -0.17
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.0 +0.93 +1.43 0.733 47.1% — — — — — — — — -0.12
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1612 99.9 -0.40 -0.46 0.727 45.0% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.10
Career — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00 — 1958 149.6 +1.58 -1.59 0.958 49.5% +15 -320 -72 44.0% -0.26 42–53 (44%) 64–88 (42%) 92.9 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.