H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Antonio Veic

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Antonio Veic.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Munoz de la Nava
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Antonio Veic
CRO Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #206 7-6(5) 7-5 Antonio Veic #228 Match data Jan 19, 2015 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #1,384 #68 732 1,761 9 28 24.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Antonio Veic #888 #119 468 1,718 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Antonio Veic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #271 1,444 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #220 1,469 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #191 1,532 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 4–6 40.0% #159 1,670 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 3–5 37.5% #131 1,641 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2013 0–5 0.0% #217 1,582 0 0
26 2008 0–1 0.0% #179 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 0–2 0.0% #216 1,585 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #473 1,549 0 0
28 2010 1–1 50.0% #147 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 0–1 0.0% #140 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 3–4 42.9% #171 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–5 28.6% #194 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 0–1 0.0% #206 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 3–13 18.8% #351 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Antonio Veic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 0.0 5.0 52.2% 62.9% 34.4% 64.3% 66.7% 49.3% 38.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 6.3 3.7 56.6% 69.5% 52.4% 71.5% 56.7% 62.0% 35.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 4/4 2.3 1.0 66.2% 63.9% 57.3% 55.4% 62.6% 61.4% 36.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 10/10 4.5 3.1 58.5% 63.2% 42.4% 48.2% 54.4% 54.3% 39.1%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 8/8 1.4 2.8 64.3% 68.9% 47.9% 50.4% 47.1% 61.5% 40.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 0.8 3.0 66.3% 56.3% 43.2% 30.8% 39.3% 51.0% 31.6%
26 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.9% 54.5% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 44.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 2/2 4.5 3.0 58.7% 79.8% 35.2% 14.3% 48.8% 62.0% 36.3% 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 65.6% 62.5% 28.6% 55.6% 25.0% 50.8% 33.3%
28 2010 2/2 3.5 1.5 55.5% 69.6% 51.6% 63.9% 56.7% 61.8% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1/1 5.0 5.0 52.8% 53.2% 47.6% 41.7% 44.4% 50.6% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7/7 1.0 3.1 58.0% 63.2% 44.0% 56.0% 47.4% 55.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7/7 2.9 4.0 54.0% 69.2% 51.2% 59.6% 23.8% 60.8% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1/1 4.0 7.0 61.7% 59.1% 48.8% 61.5% 66.7% 55.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16/16 3.5 4.3 58.2% 66.2% 50.5% 62.0% 35.1% 59.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37/37 2.9 3.8 57.1% 66.3% 48.0% 57.1% 38.5% 58.4% 35.9% — 32/32 2.8 2.9 62.0% 64.2% 46.0% 49.8% 50.9% 56.9% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Antonio Veic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1453 90.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1445 99.2 -0.85 -5.19 0.758 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1469 110.3 +0.50 +0.45 0.943 49.3% +81 — — 50.0% -0.13 2–0 1–1 — -0.06
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1532 107.8 -2.29 -0.16 0.946 48.7% +46 — — 30.0% -0.50 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1671 121.9 -3.75 +0.44 0.855 46.8% -50 +63 — 34.6% -0.81 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.16
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1642 118.3 -1.65 -0.78 1.045 50.7% -22 +89 — 42.1% +0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.12
25 2007 1482 103.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1583 108.5 -3.24 -2.73 0.645 41.5% — +148 — 16.7% -2.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.12
26 2008 1533 109.1 -0.08 -4.07 0.734 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 2014 1599 115.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1585 116.4 -1.87 -0.33 0.957 49.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.14 2015 1549 102.7 -1.93 -0.71 0.678 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
28 2010 1622 114.8 -1.38 +2.12 0.841 46.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1582 112.3 +0.84 -1.89 0.845 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1650 128.4 -1.16 +1.19 0.964 49.3% — +75 — 41.2% -0.47 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1699 128.4 -1.53 -1.91 0.813 46.9% -1 — — 30.0% -1.40 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1665 113.3 -1.03 +0.40 0.665 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1568 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1509 118.8 -2.81 -1.89 0.853 46.8% +140 +10 — 31.8% -1.20 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1762 123.5 -1.91 -1.01 0.863 47.2% +62 +34 — 33.0% -1.14 6–12 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +0.57 — 1718 116.9 -2.42 -0.65 0.868 47.2% +14 +92 — 32.9% -0.89 7–6 (54%) 1–9 (10%) 97.1 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.