H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Frederico Gil

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Frederico Gil.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Munoz de la Nava
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Frederico Gil
POR Age 41 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frederico Gil 6-4 6-7(7) 6-4 Daniel Munoz de la Nava #289 Match data Apr 28, 2014 Q1 Q Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Frederico Gil 6-3 2-6 6-1 Daniel Munoz de la Nava #156 Match data Apr 20, 2009 Q2 Q Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #1,384 #68 732 1,761 9 28 24.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frederico Gil — — — 1,782 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Frederico Gil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
26 2008 0–1 0.0% #179 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 0–2 0.0% #216 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2010 1–1 50.0% #147 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 0–1 0.0% #140 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 3–4 42.9% #171 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–5 28.6% #194 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 0–1 0.0% #206 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 3–13 18.8% #351 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Frederico Gil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2009 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 7 10 30.0% 6 21 27 22.2% — — — — — 16 24 40 40.0% 32 35 67 47.8% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 37/37 of Daniel Munoz de la Nava's and 114/115 of Frederico Gil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Frederico Gil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/3 1.0 0.5 77.9% 57.4% 37.0% 66.7% 25.0% 53.5% 36.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 62.3% 62.4% 51.3% 37.5% 35.0% 58.3% 36.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/6 3.0 2.7 68.3% 67.6% 51.0% 65.9% 36.3% 62.0% 35.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 33/33 3.1 2.3 61.2% 68.2% 50.7% 55.6% 44.1% 61.5% 36.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 21/21 2.1 2.0 66.6% 59.7% 47.4% 54.7% 43.4% 55.5% 36.3%
26 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.9% 54.5% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 44.1% 41.1% 2011 27/27 2.3 1.9 64.6% 63.7% 47.7% 51.8% 41.4% 57.9% 38.3%
27 2009 2/2 4.5 3.0 58.7% 79.8% 35.2% 14.3% 48.8% 62.0% 36.3% 2012 22/22 1.7 1.9 62.8% 64.7% 50.9% 56.4% 41.3% 59.4% 37.4%
28 2010 2/2 3.5 1.5 55.5% 69.6% 51.6% 63.9% 56.7% 61.8% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1/1 5.0 5.0 52.8% 53.2% 47.6% 41.7% 44.4% 50.6% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7/7 1.0 3.1 58.0% 63.2% 44.0% 56.0% 47.4% 55.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7/7 2.9 4.0 54.0% 69.2% 51.2% 59.6% 23.8% 60.8% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1/1 4.0 7.0 61.7% 59.1% 48.8% 61.5% 66.7% 55.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16/16 3.5 4.3 58.2% 66.2% 50.5% 62.0% 35.1% 59.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Frederico Gil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1539 103.7 +0.35 +0.51 0.779 46.2% — +27 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 1–0 — -0.19
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1593 115.1 +0.47 -1.50 0.868 47.1% — +24 — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–2 — -0.26
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1624 117.9 -1.81 +1.60 0.920 48.5% — +37 — 38.9% -0.67 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1656 139.8 -1.33 -0.33 0.951 49.1% +1 +25 -42 45.0% -0.32 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 105.0 -0.88
25 2007 1482 103.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1613 122.3 -4.71 -0.35 0.816 46.3% -32 +111 — 36.7% -0.86 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 106.2 +0.07
26 2008 1533 109.1 -0.08 -4.07 0.734 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 2011 1624 132.4 -2.73 +0.39 0.910 48.2% +26 +81 — 37.7% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 -0.33
27 2009 1585 116.4 -1.87 -0.33 0.957 49.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.14 2012 1610 123.8 -2.31 +0.07 0.921 48.6% +64 +46 — 41.2% -0.57 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +0.42
28 2010 1622 114.8 -1.38 +2.12 0.841 46.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.03 2013 1572 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1582 112.3 +0.84 -1.89 0.845 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32 2014 1536 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1650 128.4 -1.16 +1.19 0.964 49.3% — +75 — 41.2% -0.47 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 2015 1534 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1699 128.4 -1.53 -1.91 0.813 46.9% -1 — — 30.0% -1.40 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1665 113.3 -1.03 +0.40 0.665 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1568 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1542 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1509 118.8 -2.81 -1.89 0.853 46.8% +140 +10 — 31.8% -1.20 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 96.6 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1762 123.5 -1.91 -1.01 0.863 47.2% +62 +34 — 33.0% -1.14 6–12 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +0.57 — 1783 130.2 -2.42 0.00 0.901 48.1% +13 +59 -42 40.6% -0.59 23–15 (61%) 15–20 (43%) 104.8 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.