H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Nestor vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-0
Daniel Nestor holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Nestor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Nestor won the 1995 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Nestor | 6-3 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Nestor | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |