H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Nestor vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Nestor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1999 Memphis quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Nestor
CAN Age 54 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
John Van Lottum
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Daniel Nestor #104 Match data Feb 20, 1999* QF Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Nestor #1,106 #58 752 1,735 71 103 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Nestor John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–1 0.0% #823 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 1–2 33.3% #242 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 1–3 25.0% #238 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #189 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1994 5–5 50.0% #171 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1995 3–5 37.5% #177 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1996 11–13 45.8% #112 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 9–17 34.6% #107 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 11–17 39.3% #106 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 18–16 52.9% #86 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 6–9 40.0% #220 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 3–6 33.3% #219 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 0–1 0.0% #659 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2003 1–1 50.0% #500 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2004 0–1 0.0% #1062 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2006 0–1 0.0% #1115 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Nestor John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1996 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1998 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2000 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2001 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 66 112 41.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 5 7 12 41.7% — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 153/173 of Daniel Nestor's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Nestor John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1991 3/3 3.7 3.0 57.1% 61.5% 59.5% 64.4% 68.8% 60.9% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 4/4 7.0 2.3 65.8% 72.2% 42.8% 63.8% 40.0% 62.2% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 7/7 10.6 6.3 61.0% 79.0% 45.2% 70.1% 30.0% 65.9% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 9/10 5.7 6.1 56.2% 72.8% 45.6% 55.8% 46.2% 60.6% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 7/8 10.7 8.0 57.9% 75.7% 44.0% 66.7% 59.7% 62.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 20/24 7.2 6.4 56.4% 76.5% 48.6% 61.6% 37.7% 64.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 22/26 9.5 5.6 59.4% 73.8% 47.3% 53.7% 47.4% 63.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 25/28 8.4 5.8 57.7% 75.2% 47.2% 62.9% 31.9% 63.2% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 32/34 8.5 6.3 59.9% 77.4% 47.5% 64.9% 39.8% 65.3% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10/15 8.2 5.0 65.0% 72.4% 50.9% 61.7% 24.9% 65.0% 31.9% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 2001 9/9 6.4 3.1 64.1% 69.9% 53.8% 41.1% 40.3% 63.4% 36.7% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 2002 1/1 5.0 9.0 54.9% 73.3% 48.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.2% 31.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 2/2 13.5 8.0 52.4% 77.1% 52.8% 75.8% 20.0% 65.5% 31.1% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%
31 2004 1/1 5.0 2.0 64.2% 70.6% 42.1% 40.0% 12.5% 60.4% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1/1 8.0 5.0 47.5% 71.1% 47.6% 57.1% 100.0% 58.8% 25.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Nestor John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1483 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1481 100.8 -3.36 0.00 0.834 46.8% +33 — — 33.3% -1.00 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1468 104.3 +0.24 -3.16 0.811 46.5% +51 — — 30.0% -1.50 0–1 0–1 — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1486 127.0 +3.20 -0.94 0.962 49.6% +34 — — 35.3% -0.35 0–2 1–5 (17%) — -0.14 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 1994 1533 116.3 -0.41 -1.94 0.870 47.9% -12 — +53 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1995 1573 125.5 +0.35 -1.48 0.872 48.9% -1 — — 42.3% -0.15 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.18 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1996 1634 117.0 +2.02 -3.65 0.874 47.9% -46 — +26 43.6% -0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–9 (40%) 98.3 +0.68 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1997 1590 127.3 -0.03 -1.44 0.929 48.7% +19 — +20 35.4% -0.52 4–3 (57%) 2–13 (13%) 94.9 0.00 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 1998 1596 128.8 +0.61 -2.43 0.915 48.5% +30 — -28 45.8% -0.24 3–7 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 97.4 -0.60 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 1999 1672 138.5 +2.44 -2.00 1.004 50.2% +4 — -25 52.7% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 99.5 -0.06 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 2000 1624 116.5 +0.44 -2.14 0.912 48.4% +38 — -28 47.5% -0.47 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 99.4 +0.69 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 2001 1663 113.6 +0.51 -1.30 1.002 49.9% -24 — -48 40.9% -0.32 — 0–2 — -0.23 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 2002 1632 105.1 -0.84 -1.17 0.824 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2003 1631 111.5 +1.46 +1.37 0.901 49.2% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.04 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
31 2004 1619 103.0 -0.89 +2.13 0.803 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2006 1614 105.0 +0.88 +1.89 0.617 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1736 132.4 +1.02 -1.99 0.923 48.8% +8 — -4 43.3% -0.29 20–29 (41%) 33–54 (38%) 90.8 +0.71 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.