H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Nestor vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 2-0

Daniel Nestor holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Nestor leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Nestor won the 1998 Australian Open round of 64 5-7 7-5 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Nestor
CAN Age 54 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Nestor #108 5-7 7-5 6-2 6-1 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jan 23, 1998* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Nestor #148 6-3 6-4 Martin Damm Sr Match data Nov 8, 1997* QF Moscow World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Nestor #1,106 #58 752 1,735 71 103 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Daniel Nestor Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–1 0.0% #823 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
1991 1–2 33.3% #242 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
1992 1–3 25.0% #238 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 2–5 28.6% #189 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 5–5 50.0% #171 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 3–5 37.5% #177 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 11–13 45.8% #112 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 9–17 34.6% #107 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 11–17 39.3% #106 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 18–16 52.9% #86 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 6–9 40.0% #220 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 3–6 33.3% #219 1,662 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 0–1 0.0% #659 1,631 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 1–1 50.0% #500 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 0–1 0.0% #1062 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
2006 0–1 0.0% #1115 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Daniel Nestor Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1993 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1994 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1995 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1996 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1998 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1999 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
2000 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2001 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 46 66 112 41.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 5 7 12 41.7% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Daniel Nestor Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1483 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.26 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1991 1481 100.8 -3.36 0.00 0.834 46.8% +33 — — 33.3% -1.00 — — — +0.23 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1992 1468 104.3 +0.24 -3.16 0.811 46.5% +51 — — 30.0% -1.50 0–1 0–1 — +0.34 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1993 1486 127.0 +3.20 -0.94 0.962 49.6% +34 — — 35.3% -0.35 0–2 1–5 (17%) — -0.14 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1994 1533 116.3 -0.41 -1.94 0.870 47.9% -12 — +53 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) — — +0.03 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1995 1573 125.5 +0.35 -1.48 0.872 48.9% -1 — — 42.3% -0.15 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.18 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1996 1634 117.0 +2.02 -3.65 0.874 47.9% -46 — +26 43.6% -0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–9 (40%) 98.3 +0.68 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1997 1590 127.3 -0.03 -1.44 0.929 48.7% +19 — +20 35.4% -0.52 4–3 (57%) 2–13 (13%) 94.9 0.00 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1998 1596 128.8 +0.61 -2.43 0.915 48.5% +30 — -28 45.8% -0.24 3–7 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 97.4 -0.60 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1999 1672 138.5 +2.44 -2.00 1.004 50.2% +4 — -25 52.7% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 99.5 -0.06 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2000 1624 116.5 +0.44 -2.14 0.912 48.4% +38 — -28 47.5% -0.47 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 99.4 +0.69 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2001 1663 113.6 +0.51 -1.30 1.002 49.9% -24 — -48 40.9% -0.32 — 0–2 — -0.23 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2002 1632 105.1 -0.84 -1.17 0.824 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.26 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
2003 1631 111.5 +1.46 +1.37 0.901 49.2% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.04 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
2004 1619 103.0 -0.89 +2.13 0.803 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2006 1614 105.0 +0.88 +1.89 0.617 45.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1736 132.4 +1.02 -1.99 0.923 48.8% +8 — -4 43.3% -0.29 20–29 (41%) 33–54 (38%) 90.8 +0.71 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.