H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-2
Adrian Voinea holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adrian Voinea leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 2000 Sydney fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2000* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Adrian Voinea | 7-5 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1996* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Adrian Voinea | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1995* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-0 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |