H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-0
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Marseille fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1998* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 6-2 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |