H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Vacek vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-1

Daniel Vacek holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Austrian Open Kitzbühel round of 32 6-3 0-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Vacek #52 6-3 0-6 7-5 Andrei Cherkasov #158 Match data Jul 29, 1999* R32 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Andrei Cherkasov #136 6-3 7-6(3) Daniel Vacek #51 Match data Apr 16, 1997* R64 Japan Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Daniel Vacek #34 6-4 6-4 Andrei Cherkasov #138 Match data Aug 15, 1996* R32 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Vacek Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2
30 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Vacek Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4% — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's and 257/282 of Andrei Cherkasov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Vacek Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1% 1991 58/66 2.6 2.3 60.4% 68.1% 52.1% 61.2% 43.9% 61.9% 41.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 56/63 3.4 1.5 60.9% 68.6% 52.6% 59.2% 43.1% 62.3% 38.9%
22 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8% 1993 62/65 2.2 1.9 58.0% 66.2% 49.4% 58.2% 41.3% 58.9% 38.9%
23 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7% 1994 32/35 2.0 4.2 55.9% 61.0% 41.5% 45.2% 47.8% 52.5% 38.4%
24 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7% 1995 6/7 1.7 1.5 56.6% 60.6% 54.8% 40.9% 45.8% 57.8% 38.6%
25 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5% 1996 14/15 1.2 4.3 68.4% 61.3% 39.3% 43.9% 41.9% 54.7% 34.9%
26 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9% 1997 14/15 2.0 2.0 60.5% 63.5% 45.4% 57.3% 43.8% 56.7% 39.4%
27 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5% 1998 3/3 2.3 3.3 54.9% 62.6% 47.1% 53.9% 57.4% 55.2% 35.1%
28 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2% 1999 9/9 1.8 5.1 58.2% 66.8% 44.8% 59.9% 51.4% 57.2% 43.7%
29 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4% 2000 3/4 1.7 3.7 58.6% 62.7% 51.9% 33.7% 62.1% 58.3% 34.4%
30 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4% — 257/375 2.4 2.5 59.6% 65.9% 48.9% 56.0% 44.1% 59.0% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Vacek Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.78
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.83
20 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) — -1.80
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) — -2.86
22 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.60
23 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -2.62
24 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.66
26 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.31
27 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13
28 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30
29 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05
30 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71 — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.