H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 2-2
Daniel Vacek and Arnaud Boetsch are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 2–0 on carpet, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1996 Vienna fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1996* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1995* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(7) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1995* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-4 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1995* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-2 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |