H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 0-1
Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1995 Moscow final 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1995* | Moscow | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Carl Uwe Steeb | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |