H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Daniel Vacek vs Chris Pridham H2H: 0-1

Chris Pridham holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Pridham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1993 Kuala Lumpur (1) round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Chris Pridham
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Pridham #131 6-2 6-3 Daniel Vacek #107 Match data Jan 7, 1993* R32 Kuala Lumpur (1) ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chris Pridham #1,219 #75 433 1,650 51 75 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Vacek Chris Pridham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,481 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% #263 1,471 0 0
22 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #114 1,483 0 0
23 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0 1988 13–16 44.8% #137 1,526 0 0
24 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #146 1,553 0 0
25 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0 1990 2–7 22.2% #155 1,488 0 0
26 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0 1991 3–5 37.5% #132 1,492 0 0
27 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% #131 1,578 0 0
28 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0 1993 11–15 42.3% #145 1,587 0 0
29 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #1219 1,566 0 0
30 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Vacek Chris Pridham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1991 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1992 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1993 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4% — 36 49 85 42.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's and 61/65 of Chris Pridham's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Vacek Chris Pridham
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9% 1991 7/8 3.1 3.1 59.3% 72.8% 51.4% 71.7% 35.7% 64.0% 33.5%
27 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5% 1992 27/30 2.9 3.3 60.5% 69.9% 49.8% 59.5% 30.2% 61.9% 35.7%
28 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2% 1993 26/26 3.9 2.8 57.1% 69.6% 53.6% 59.0% 30.2% 62.8% 35.5%
29 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4% 1994 1/1 2.0 5.0 54.8% 67.6% 46.4% 57.1% 50.0% 58.1% 29.1%
30 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4% — 61/126 3.3 3.1 58.8% 70.0% 51.6% 60.6% 31.2% 62.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Vacek Chris Pridham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10 1985 1482 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.34
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1472 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
22 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29 1987 1484 114.7 — — — — +31 — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
23 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41 1988 1527 113.0 — — — — -2 — +65 43.0% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.74
24 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99 1989 1553 117.5 — — — — +10 — +31 38.8% -0.55 4–3 (57%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.55
25 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02 1990 1489 104.8 — — — — +21 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.95
26 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33 1991 1493 107.7 +0.73 -1.59 0.929 49.5% +26 — — 38.9% -0.28 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.81
27 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31 1992 1579 126.9 -0.38 -2.42 0.936 48.9% +35 — -20 45.1% -0.18 8–5 (62%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.59
28 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89 1993 1587 128.0 +0.43 -1.47 0.953 49.3% +22 — — 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.79
29 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16 1994 1566 97.9 -2.87 +0.77 0.694 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25
30 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71 — 1650 123.5 +0.05 -1.87 0.938 49.1% +19 — +37 41.9% -0.45 22–21 (51%) 23–39 (37%) 97.1 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.