H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Chris Pridham H2H: 0-1
Chris Pridham holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Pridham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1993 Kuala Lumpur (1) third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1993* | Kuala Lumpur (1) | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 6-2 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Chris Pridham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |