H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Christian Bergstrom H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Christian Bergstrom are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christian Bergstrom leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1994 Australian Open first round 6-3 1-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 58
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 1-1 (ret.) | Christian Bergstrom | Match data |
| Jul 8, 1993* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Christian Bergstrom | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christian Bergstrom | #1,327 | #32 | 876 | 1,867 | 159 | 164 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Christian Bergstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #410 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #69 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #106 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #80 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #58 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #259 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |