H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daniel Vacek vs David Prinosil H2H: 4-0

Daniel Vacek holds a 4–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Japan Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Vacek #89 6-4 6-1 David Prinosil #102 Match data Apr 18, 1998* QF Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Daniel Vacek #66 6-0 6-2 David Prinosil #78 Match data Nov 6, 1997* R32 Moscow World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Daniel Vacek #67 6-2 6-4 David Prinosil #49 Match data Aug 13, 1997* R64 New Haven Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Daniel Vacek #33 6-4 2-6 6-4 David Prinosil #66 Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Vacek David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2
25 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2
26 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2
27 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniel Vacek David Prinosil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
25 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4% — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Vacek David Prinosil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8%
20 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1% 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1%
22 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8% 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1%
23 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7% 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6%
24 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7% 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0%
25 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5% 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7%
26 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9% 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1%
27 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5% 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4%
28 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2% 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3%
29 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4% 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1%
30 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2% 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3%
31 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6% 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Vacek David Prinosil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.25
20 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.64
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54
22 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.15
23 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.73
24 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.03
25 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.31
26 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.22
27 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.01
28 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — -1.97
29 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15
30 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16
31 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71 — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.