H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Gouichi Motomura H2H: 1-0
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Gouichi Motomura in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 52
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1998* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-2 | Gouichi Motomura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gouichi Motomura | #1,422 | #134 | 312 | 1,500 | 10 | 29 | 25.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Gouichi Motomura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #505 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #345 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #236 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #221 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #256 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,383 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |