H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Hernan Gumy H2H: 0-2
Hernan Gumy holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hernan Gumy leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hernan Gumy won the 2000 Munich third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 54
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2000* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hernan Gumy | 6-0 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Hernan Gumy | 5-3 (ret.) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hernan Gumy | #893 | #39 | 948 | 1,766 | 108 | 121 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Hernan Gumy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #62 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #109 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #610 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |