H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Jason Stoltenberg H2H: 2-1
Daniel Vacek holds a 2–1 lead over Jason Stoltenberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jason Stoltenberg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-2 3-6 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1998* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 3-6 7-6(8) | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 5-7 7-6(1) 7-6(11) | Jason Stoltenberg | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jason Stoltenberg | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jason Stoltenberg | #556 | #19 | 1,299 | 1,923 | 294 | 259 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Jason Stoltenberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #413 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #84 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #108 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #168 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #80 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #31 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #79 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #27 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #66 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |