H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Joern Renzenbrink H2H: 1-2
Joern Renzenbrink holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Joern Renzenbrink leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1994 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1994* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-4 | Joern Renzenbrink | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1993* | Durban | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Joern Renzenbrink | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1993* | Zaragoza | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joern Renzenbrink | 6-4 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joern Renzenbrink | #1,192 | #70 | 614 | 1,710 | 34 | 54 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Joern Renzenbrink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #168 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #281 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |