H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Karsten Braasch H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Karsten Braasch are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay, while Karsten Braasch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karsten Braasch won the 1995 Miami Masters first round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Karsten Braasch | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| May 11, 1994* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-3 | Karsten Braasch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Karsten Braasch | #1,445 | #38 | 878 | 1,731 | 68 | 93 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Karsten Braasch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #56 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #167 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #271 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #261 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #437 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |