H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Marc Kevin Goellner H2H: 1-0
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Kevin Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 6-4 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 7-5 6-3 | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marc Kevin Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Marc Kevin Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |