H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniel Vacek vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 2-3

Martin Damm Sr holds a 3–2 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Martin Damm Sr leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1998 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 6-4 7-6(7) Daniel Vacek #85 Match data Apr 9, 1998* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Martin Damm Sr 6-3 4-6 6-3 Daniel Vacek #49 Match data Oct 19, 1995* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Daniel Vacek #53 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Martin Damm Sr Match data Feb 9, 1995* R32 Marseille ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Martin Damm Sr 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-4 Daniel Vacek #55 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniel Vacek #57 7-6(8) 5-7 7-6(7) Martin Damm Sr Match data Oct 20, 1994* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Daniel Vacek Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Daniel Vacek Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Daniel Vacek Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 +0.29 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) 103.3 -1.41 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) 98.8 -1.99 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -2.02 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) 100.7 -0.33 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) 102.7 +0.31 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) 104.5 +0.89 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -1.16 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.