H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 2-3
Martin Damm Sr holds a 3–2 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Martin Damm Sr leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1998 Hong Kong third round 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1998* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 7-6(7) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1995* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Martin Damm Sr | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1995* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Martin Damm Sr | 5-7 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1994* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(8) 5-7 7-6(7) | Martin Damm Sr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,744 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daniel Vacek | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |