H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Mats Wilander H2H: 0-1
Mats Wilander holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1995 Rotterdam third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1995* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mats Wilander | 6-4 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |