H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Nicklas Kulti are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1997 Halle third round 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Nicklas Kulti | 7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(4) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1993* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |