H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Olivier Delaitre H2H: 1-1
Daniel Vacek and Olivier Delaitre are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Olivier Delaitre leads 1–0 on carpet, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Olivier Delaitre won the 1997 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1997* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Olivier Delaitre | 6-3 7-6(1) | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1996* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Olivier Delaitre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Olivier Delaitre | #1,311 | #33 | 958 | 1,810 | 129 | 178 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Olivier Delaitre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #49 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #218 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #143 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #186 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |