H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Daniel Vacek vs Omar Camporese H2H: 1-0
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Omar Camporese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1996 Rome Masters second round 6-4 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1996* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Omar Camporese | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Omar Camporese | #1,381 | #18 | 1,253 | 1,915 | 137 | 146 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Vacek | Omar Camporese | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #216 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #49 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #24 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #42 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #244 | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #120 | 1,598 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #127 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #336 | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |